Humanity is destroying the planet, and in-turn, itself or an underdeveloped market sector needed a boost in federal investment and the forerunners just happen to have friends in high places; these are two realities that exist today. One reality is a discussion about science in its infancy that has yet to be entirely thought out (we discovered fire eons ago, but the first matches were a recent invention). The other is the reality of the situation at hand: cronies of the current administration (and the previous one, Al Gore) working in technology stumbled across some very interesting and plausible science ‘proving’ that humans were destroying the world. These cronies developed an argument, brought it to their powerful friends and got rich off the windfall investments in their technology that could ‘save’ US all. Given the historical ‘pay for play’ atmosphere in DC, which is the more likely scenario?
Links
-> Retired Officers Poised to Profit After Pentagon’s Alarmist Climate Change Report
-> 10 Things You Need To Know Before The Opening Bell
-> Prince Charles: Reform Capitalism to Save The Planet
-> Why We Need The 2nd Amendment: In Case Gov’t Goes ‘Off The Rail’
-> EPA Can Regulate CO2, But Can Lawyers Beat The Rules In Court?
-> The Intellectual Dishonesty of Obama and Other False Purists
-> 5 Brilliant Business Lessons From Moetley Crue (seriously)
Top Photo: Steve A Johnson via Flickr
