7.3% Unemployment, Really? Then Why The Record Number Not In Labor Force? Why The Constant Revisions? And Why Over 100 Million People On Some Sort Of Aid? It Takes a Lie To Cover a Lie.

by • September 6, 2013 • Top Story • Comments Off on 7.3% Unemployment, Really? Then Why The Record Number Not In Labor Force? Why The Constant Revisions? And Why Over 100 Million People On Some Sort Of Aid? It Takes a Lie To Cover a Lie. • 1278

Unemployment

90,473,000: Record Number Not in Labor Force–Up Almost 10M Under Obama

A disappointing jobs report on Friday raised doubts about whether the Federal Reserve would — or should — start pulling back

Unemployment Rate Down 0.5% in 56 Months Since Obama Became President

Today’s jobs number (and revisions) are sparking some initial vain hope that SepTaper is delayed and providing enough ‘optimism’ that Fed spice will flow just a little longer.

The U.S. Department of Agriculture estimates that a total of 101,000,000 people currently participate in at least one of the 15 food programs offered by the agency, at a cost of $114 billion in fiscal year 2012.

NYTIMES blames bad jobs month on plunge in porn industry

Pyramid

Pin It

Related Posts